Introduction: The Network Monitoring Fragmentation Problem
In five years working with Enterprise accounts at Elastic, I have heard the same challenge again and again:
"We have several network monitoring tools, and we would love to correlate all of them into one platform."
For many organizations, the barrier to true correlation isn't a lack of data, but where that data lives. Frequently, we see SNMP metrics, flow data, and logs isolated in purpose-built silos or dashboards. Without a unified data store and a proper correlation engine, piecing together the full narrative — from a topology change to a performance degradation — becomes a manual, time-consuming puzzle.
When an incident happens, engineers become human correlation engines — manually jumping between systems, copying timestamps, cross-referencing device names, and trying to piece together what actually happened. A simple question like "Did this interface failure impact application performance?" requires querying multiple tools and mentally correlating the results.
The real cost isn't the tool licenses — it's the time lost during critical incidents.
This lab is my answer to a fundamental question: Can Elastic become the unified foundation that actually correlates network data?
More importantly, it demonstrates that Elastic is fully ready for network operations — capable of ingesting diverse telemetry and using AI to correlate relationships, identify root causes, and resolve issues in seconds instead of hours.
The Problem: Network Observability is Broken
Let me paint a typical scenario I encounter with enterprise network teams:
The Fragmented Reality:
- No single source of truth
- Manual correlation during incidents (15-30 minutes per event)
- Fragmented teams (network vs. platform engineers)
- Limited automation capabilities
- No AI-powered analysis
When a link goes down at 2 AM:
- Notice the alert - 2 minutes
- Log into monitoring tool to see the metric - 3 minutes
- Switch to traffic analyzer to check impact - 5 minutes
- Open log management to search for related messages - 10 minutes
- Manually correlate timestamps across systems - 8 minutes
- Create a ticket and copy context from multiple tools - 8 minutes
Time to initial diagnosis: 36 minutes
This workflow is expensive, error-prone, and doesn't scale.
The Vision: Elastic as a Unified Network Observability Platform
What if you could:
- Collect SNMP metrics, NetFlow, traps, and topology data in one platform
- Correlate network events with application performance automatically
- Generate executive dashboards without separate BI tools
- Use AI to analyze incidents in seconds, not hours
- Trigger alerting from network events
This is what this lab aims to demonstrate.
What I Built: A Production-Grade Network Simulation
To demonstrate how Elastic unifies network data, I needed a realistic environment that generates real-world telemetry. Enter Containerlab — a Docker-based solution that enables us to create a network simulation framework.
Lab Architecture
I simulated a Service Provider core network with:
- 7 FRR routers forming an OSPF Area 0 mesh
- 2 Ubuntu hosts for additional use cases
- 2 Layer 2 switches for access layer segmentation
- 3 telemetry collectors feeding Elastic Cloud
Total containers: 14
Deployment time: 12-15 minutes (fully automated)
Full deployment instructions and topology details are available in the GitHub repository README.
The Three Telemetry Pipelines: Proving Multi-Source Correlation
What makes this lab production-ready is its hybrid observability approach — proving that Elastic can unify disparate network data sources.
| Pipeline | Data Type | Collection Method | Collector | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNMP Metrics | Interface stats, system health, LLDP topology | Active polling | OTEL Collector | Capacity planning, trend analysis |
| NetFlow | Traffic flows | Push-based export | Elastic Agent | Top talkers, security investigation |
| SNMP Traps | Interface up/down events | Event-driven | Logstash | Real-time incident detection |
This unified architecture proves Elastic can replace multiple specialized network monitoring tools with a single platform.
The Power of Correlation: One Platform, One Query
When a network incident occurs, you need to answer questions like:
- Which interface failed? (SNMP metrics)
- What traffic was affected? (NetFlow)
- What was the sequence of events? (SNMP traps)
- Which devices are downstream? (LLDP topology)
The Problem: modern tools offer separate modules glued together, forcing users to navigate different spaces for different sets of data.
The Reality: You still have to pivot. You see a spike in the Metrics module, but to see why, you have to open the Logs module and manually align the time picker. The data lives in different tables or backends, making true correlation impossible without human intervention.
The Elastic Difference: One Store, One Language, One AI
Elastic makes it simple. Whether it's an SNMP counter (metric), a NetFlow record (flow), or a Syslog message (log), it is all stored in a unified datastore powered by the Elasticsearch engine. This allows users to easily search across multiple datasets in a single query.
FROM logs-*
| WHERE host.name == "csr23" AND interface.name == "eth1"
Time required: 3 seconds
Furthermore, as you will see later, the exact location of the data becomes agnostic to the user when leveraging the AI Assistant.
Data Transformation: From Cryptic OIDs to Actionable Intelligence
Raw SNMP traps are notoriously difficult to interpret at a glance. In our current lab setup, the data arrives looking like this:
OID: 1.3.6.1.6.3.1.1.5.3
ifIndex: 2
ifDescr: eth1
While traditional Network Management Platforms (NMPs) handle OID translation natively, bringing that clarity into Elastic requires a specific configuration.
In this initial lab, we are intentionally working with this raw data to demonstrate how AI assistants can interpret these events even without pre-existing context.
However, the strategy for the next phase of this project is to implement Elasticsearch Ingest Pipelines. This will allow us to map raw OIDs to human-readable names. This step is crucial for bridging the gap between Network tools and Application Observability platforms, allowing network events to be instantly correlated with application errors and infrastructure logs.
The Target State
Once the pipeline is implemented in the next lab, we will transform that raw trap into searchable, meaningful data:
{
"event.action": "interface-down",
"host.name": "csr23",
"interface.name": "eth1",
"interface.oper_status_text": "Link Down"
}
The result:
- Human-readable fields
- Searchable dimensions for filtering
- Context for automation rules and dashboards
- Correlation keys for joining with metrics and flows
In our next blog post, we will walk through building the ingest pipeline that performs this transformation — step by step.
Intelligent Alerting: From Noise to Actionable Intelligence
Traditional network monitoring relies on simple threshold alerts — "interface down," "high CPU." These alerts flood your inbox but provide zero context about root cause, impact, or remediation.
The Lab's Approach: ES|QL + AI Assistant
1. Semantic Detection with ES|QL
Instead of generic threshold alerts, the lab uses ES|QL to detect specific event patterns:
FROM logs-snmp.trap-prod
| WHERE snmp.trap_oid == "1.3.6.1.6.3.1.1.5.3"
| KEEP @timestamp, host.name, interface.name, message
2. Automatic AI-Powered Investigation
When the alert triggers, it invokes the Observability AI Assistant with a structured investigation prompt that:
- Performs immediate triage (which device, which interface, when)
- Assesses OSPF impact and traffic rerouting
- Correlates with other recent failures
- Generates severity assessment and recommended actions
The Transformation
| Traditional Alerting | Intelligent Alerting (Elastic) |
|---|---|
| Email: "Interface down on csr23" | Structured analysis with device context |
| Manual investigation: 20-30 min | AI-automated investigation: 90 seconds |
| Engineer correlates across tools | Automatic cross-source correlation |
| No business impact assessment | Severity + recommended actions included |
Accelerating Incident Response with the Elastic AI Assistant
This is where the Elastic AI Assistant demonstrates its operational value — moving beyond passive data collection to actively interpret and explain network events in real-time
When an engineer views a trap document in Discover and asks:
"Explain this log message"
The AI Assistant provides comprehensive analysis including:
- What happened: Plain-language explanation of the SNMP trap
- Device context: Router role, interface purpose, network position
- Impact analysis: OSPF neighbor status, traffic rerouting assessment
- Root cause possibilities: Physical layer, link layer, administrative causes
- Recommended actions: Immediate steps, investigation queries, validation checks
- Severity assessment: Business and technical impact rating
Manual Triage vs. AI-Assisted Investigation
| Before | After (Elastic AI) |
|---|---|
| Google the OID → 5 min | Click "Explain this log" → 20 seconds |
| Open network diagram → 3 min | Topology context auto-provided |
| Query multiple tools → 10 min | Cross-source correlation instant |
| Assess business impact → 5 min | Impact analysis auto-generated |
| Total: ~28 minutes | Total: ~20 seconds |
The Value Proposition: One Platform, One Data Model, One AI
What This Lab Demonstrates
Elastic provides:
- One unified platform for metrics, logs, flows
- One data model (SemConv) for consistent correlation
- One search interface (Kibana) for all network data
- One AI assistant that understands all your network telemetry
- AI-powered alerting with automated investigation
Business Impact
Efficiency Gains:
- 85% reduction in MTTR (36 min → 5 min for initial diagnosis)
- 90% reduction in manual correlation time
- Junior engineers gain access to AI-powered expert analysis
Operational Benefits:
- Network engineers focus on strategy, not tool-switching
- Cross-functional collaboration in one platform
- Reduced tool sprawl and management overhead
Lessons Learned
After building this lab, several key insights emerged regarding how network data fits into the broader observability ecosystem:
1. Extending Observability to the Network
Elastic is already the gold standard for high-volume logs and application traces. This lab demonstrates that the same engine seamlessly handles network telemetry without needing a separate, siloed tool.
- Scale: The same architecture that ingests petabytes of application logs easily handles millions of interface counters.
- Structure: Native support for complex nested documents allows for rich SNMP trap data (variable bindings) without flattening or losing context.
- Speed: Real-time search applies equally to network events, enabling sub-second troubleshooting.
2. OpenTelemetry Semantic Conventions (SemConv) as the Universal Translator
The power isn't just in storing the data, but in standardizing it. By mapping SNMP and NetFlow to the OpenTelemetry Semantic Conventions (SemConv), network data finally speaks the same language as the rest of the stack.
- Unified Search: Query across firewall logs, server metrics, and switch telemetry in a single search bar.
- Instant Visualization: Pre-built dashboards work immediately because the field names are standardized.
- Cross-Domain Correlation: Easily correlates a spike in application latency with a specific interface saturation event.
3. AI Assistants Thrive on Context
While the AI in this lab was powerful on its own, the experiment highlighted a critical realization: an AI Assistant becomes exponentially more effective when coupled with a specific Knowledge Base.
Context is King: The AI delivers better root cause analysis when provided with rich metadata, such as device roles and topology maps. Without it, the advice remains generic.
Pro Tip (and What’s Next):
To get organization-specific advice rather than generic suggestions, you need to feed the AI your documentation.
- The Goal: Create a Knowledge Base containing device roles, network topology diagrams, and troubleshooting procedures.
- The Next Step: In my next blog post, I will demonstrate exactly how to do this — connecting a Knowledge Base to the AI Assistant to enable fully context-aware troubleshooting.
Conclusion: Completing the Observability Picture
Elastic is already widely recognized as the standard for Application and Security observability. The goal of this lab wasn't to ask if Elastic can handle networking, but to demonstrate the immense value of bringing network data into that existing ecosystem.
The verdict is clear: Elastic acts as that unified foundation. It effectively breaks down the silo between Network Engineering and the rest of IT.
This isn't just about consolidating dashboards or replacing legacy tools. It is about establishing the Elasticsearch AI Platform as the single source of truth where network telemetry sits right alongside application and infrastructure data.
By treating network data as a first-class citizen in the observability stack, we unlock automated correlation, AI-assisted investigation, and the speed required to resolve incidents before they impact the business. The capabilities are in place, and the foundation is solid — Elastic is ready to unify your network with the rest of your digital business.
Ready to Try It Yourself?
Check out github.com/DeBaker1974/Containerlab-OSPF
The repository includes:
- Complete deployment scripts (12-15 minute automated setup)
- Pre-configured telemetry pipelines
- Kibana dashboards
- Alert rules with AI Assistant integration
- Detailed README
Not ready to build? Try Elastic Serverless: Start a free 14-day trial and explore AI-powered observability with your own data.
Special thanks to the Containerlab and FRRouting communities for their incredible open-source tools, and to Sheriff Lawal (CCIE, CISSP), Sr. Manager, Solutions Architecture at Elastic, for mentoring on this project.